Reading lists Most assigned

The most assigned readings

The 54 readings that 6 or more of the 30 PhD syllabi and reading lists assign: a rough canon of doctoral training in organization theory and strategy. The number beside each is how many sources assign it; the line below gives its stream.

The streams with the most of them: 11 Social networks and embeddedness (8), 19 Resource-based view and capabilities (8), 15 Behavioral theory of the firm and organizational learning (7), 5 Organizational ecology and demography (6).

By decade

Before 1950: 1 reading<19501950s: 1 reading1950s1960s: 4 readings1960s1970s: 5 readings1970s1980s: 14 readings1980s1990s: 17 readings171990s2000s: 10 readings2000s2010s: 2 readings2010s2020s: 0 readings2020s
Most date from the 1990s; half were published in 1991 or later.
Readings by decade
DecadeReadings
Before 19501
1950s1
1960s4
1970s5
1980s14
1990s17
2000s10
2010s2
2020s0

Readings

  1. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311 11.1 Embeddedness and network forms of organization · 11 Social networks and embeddedness15
  2. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 15.5 Exploration and exploitation · 15 Behavioral theory of the firm and organizational learning15
  3. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 8.1 Foundations: myth, ceremony and isomorphism · 8 Institutional theory14
  4. Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x 21.1 Theory of the firm and its boundaries · 21 Organizational economics12
  5. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper and Row. 4 Resource dependence and power12
  6. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural Inertia and Organizational Change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095567 5 Organizational ecology and demography12
  7. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The Population Ecology of Organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964. https://doi.org/10.1086/226424 5 Organizational ecology and demography11
  8. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553 15.6 Knowledge, absorptive capacity and transfer · 15 Behavioral theory of the firm and organizational learning11
  9. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550 8.1 Foundations: myth, ceremony and isomorphism · 8 Institutional theory10
  10. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 19 Resource-based view and capabilities10
  11. Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392088 15.2 Bounded rationality, goals, coalitions and decision making · 15 Behavioral theory of the firm and organizational learning9
  12. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469 11.3 Strong and weak ties, social capital · 11 Social networks and embeddedness9
  13. Williamson, O. E. (1981). The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577. https://doi.org/10.1086/227496 21.2 Transaction cost economics · 21 Organizational economics9
  14. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943 11.3 Strong and weak ties, social capital · 11 Social networks and embeddedness9
  15. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press. 11.4 Structural holes, brokerage and closure · 11 Social networks and embeddedness9
  16. Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398–1438. https://doi.org/10.1086/210178 9 Categories, identity and authenticity9
  17. Carroll, G. R., & Swaminathan, A. (2000). Why the Microbrewery Movement? Organizational Dynamics of Resource Partitioning in the U.S. Brewing Industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), 715–762. https://doi.org/10.1086/318962 5 Organizational ecology and demography9
  18. Podolny, J. M. (2001). Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1086/323038 11.2 Networks and markets · 11 Social networks and embeddedness9
  19. Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.2.167 4 Resource dependence and power9
  20. Aldrich, H. E., & Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. 16.1 Evolutionary theory and routines · 16 Evolutionary theory, technology and innovation9
  21. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-Dependence Relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089716 4 Resource dependence and power8
  22. Stinchcombe, A. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations (pp. 142–169). Rand McNally. 5 Organizational ecology and demography8
  23. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. McGraw-Hill. 3 Contingency and configurational theory8
  24. Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392383 8.3 Diffusion, adoption and translation of practices · 8 Institutional theory8
  25. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037 21.3 Agency theory and corporate control · 21 Organizational economics8
  26. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207 19 Resource-based view and capabilities8
  27. Levitt, B. (1988). Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.14.1.319 15.4 Organizational learning · 15 Behavioral theory of the firm and organizational learning8
  28. Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What Theory is Not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393788 W1 Theory and theorizing8
  29. Greve, H. R. (1998). Performance, Aspirations, and Risky Organizational Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393591 15.3 Aspirations and performance feedback · 15 Behavioral theory of the firm and organizational learning8
  30. Davis, G. F., & Marquis, C. (2005). Prospects for Organization Theory in the Early Twenty-First Century: Institutional Fields and Mechanisms. Organization Science, 16(4), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0137 W1 Theory and theorizing8
  31. Gavetti, G., Greve, H. R., Levinthal, D. A., & Ocasio, W. (2012). The Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Assessment and Prospects. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.656841 15.1 Foundations: the behavioral theory of the firm · 15 Behavioral theory of the firm and organizational learning8
  32. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 16.1 Evolutionary theory and routines · 16 Evolutionary theory, technology and innovation7
  33. Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392832 16.3 Technological change and discontinuities · 16 Evolutionary theory, technology and innovation7
  34. Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549 16.3 Technological change and discontinuities · 16 Evolutionary theory, technology and innovation7
  35. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1992). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Blackwell. 15.1 Foundations: the behavioral theory of the firm · 15 Behavioral theory of the firm and organizational learning7
  36. Podolny, J. M. (1993). A Status-Based Model of Market Competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 829–872. https://doi.org/10.1086/230091 12 Status and social evaluation7
  37. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393808 11.1 Embeddedness and network forms of organization · 11 Social networks and embeddedness7
  38. Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011928 19 Resource-based view and capabilities7
  39. Hsu, G. (2006). Jacks of All Trades and Masters of None: Audiences' Reactions to Spanning Genres in Feature Film Production. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 420–450. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.3.420 9 Categories, identity and authenticity7
  40. Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press. 19 Resource-based view and capabilities6
  41. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391211 3 Contingency and configurational theory6
  42. Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392767 7.7 Practice, materiality and technology · 7 Culture, cognition and sensemaking6
  43. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504 19 Resource-based view and capabilities6
  44. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational Ecology. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038288 5 Organizational ecology and demography6
  45. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303 19 Resource-based view and capabilities6
  46. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788 8.2 Legitimacy and decoupling · 8 Institutional theory6
  47. Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.2307/258627 21.6 Assessments and critiques · 21 Organizational economics6
  48. Uzzi, B. (1996). The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096399 11.1 Embeddedness and network forms of organization · 11 Social networks and embeddedness6
  49. Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271 11.5 Interorganizational networks, alliances and interlocks · 11 Social networks and embeddedness6
  50. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::aid-smj882>3.0.co;2-z 19 Resource-based view and capabilities6
  51. Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011938 19 Resource-based view and capabilities6
  52. Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 795–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/367917 10 Social movements, power and inequality6
  53. Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (2004). The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton University Press. 5 Organizational ecology and demography6
  54. Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2010). How New Market Categories Emerge: Temporal Dynamics of Legitimacy, Identity, and Entrepreneurship in Satellite Radio, 1990–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3), 439–471. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.439 9 Categories, identity and authenticity6