Zhongyuan Sun

Reading lists Stream 8Search all readings

Institutional theory

Isomorphism, legitimacy, diffusion, institutional change, logics and entrepreneurship.

Of its 228 readings, 79 are assigned in two or more sources and listed first, with the number of sources beside each (in bold for the core readings, in 4 or more); the 149 listed in only one source are folded under each heading.

In the theory tree: grows out of 7 Culture, cognition and sensemaking; leads to 9 Categories, identity and authenticity and 10 Social movements, power and inequality.

Drawn from: Lounsbury & Zhao (Oxford Bibliographies); Pollock (Tennessee); Maoret (IESE); Dobbin (Harvard); Yiu (CUHK); Marquis (HBS); Yue (USC); Fiss (USC); Sullivan (HKUST); Zhou (HKU); Wan (CUHK); Clough (UBC); Peng (UT Dallas); Lu, Li, Park, Yang & Yan (CityU); Anteby (Boston University); Zuckerman (MIT); DiMaggio (Princeton); Martin (Berkeley); Yao (HBS); Henisz (Wharton); Cameron (Wharton); Levinthal (Wharton); Amit (Wharton). Full details of the sources are on the reading lists page.

By decade

Before 1950: 3 readings<19501950s: 2 readings1950s1960s: 2 readings1960s1970s: 4 readings1970s1980s: 17 readings1980s1990s: 59 readings1990s2000s: 90 readings902000s2010s: 48 readings2010s2020s: 3 readings2020s
Most date from the 2000s; half were published in 2004 or later.

8.1 Foundations: myth, ceremony and isomorphism

  1. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/209510114
  2. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/22655010
  3. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226185941.001.00015
  4. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Sage.5
  5. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. University of California Press.4
  6. Zucker, L. G. (1977). The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726. https://doi.org/10.2307/20948624
  7. Perrow, C. (1986). Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. McGraw-Hill.4
  8. Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Lander, M. W. (2009). Structure! Agency! (And Other Quarrels): A Meta-Analysis Of Institutional Theories Of Organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 61–85. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.364618354
  9. Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the Theory of Organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.2307/20867523
  10. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the Grass Roots. University of California Press.3
  11. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 1–40). University of Chicago Press.3
  12. Dobbin, F. (1994). Cultural models of organization: the social construction of rational organizing principles. In D. Crane (Ed.), The Sociology of Culture: Emerging Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 117–42). Blackwell.3
  13. Hirsch, P. M., & Lounsbury, M. (1997). Ending the Family Quarrel: Toward a Reconciliation of “Old” and “New” Institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642970400040043
  14. Mizruchi, M. S., & Fein, L. C. (1999). The Social Construction of Organizational Knowledge: A Study of the Uses of Coercive, Mimetic, and Normative Isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 653–683. https://doi.org/10.2307/26670513
  15. Schneiberg, M., & Clemens, E. S. (2006). The Typical Tools for the Job: Research Strategies in Institutional Analysis. Sociological Theory, 24(3), 195–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2006.00288.x3
  16. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. SAGE.3
  17. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 1–46). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n13
  18. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R., & Sahlin, K. (2008). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/97818492003873
  19. Merton, R. K. (1936). The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action. American Sociological Review, 1(6), 894. https://doi.org/10.2307/20846152
  20. Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional Theories of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.0023032
  21. Scott, W. R. (1987). The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493. https://doi.org/10.2307/23928802
  22. Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (1996). Exploring the Limits of the New Institutionalism: The Causes and Consequences of Illegitimate Organizational Change. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 812. https://doi.org/10.2307/20964552
  23. Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional Theory Contributing To Atheoretical Research Program. In Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development (pp. 460–484). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199276813.003.00222
17 more, listed in one source
  1. Zald, M. N., & Denton, P. (1963). From Evangelism to General Service: The Transformation of the YMCA. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8(2), 214. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390900
  2. Clark, B. R. (1972). The Organizational Saga in Higher Education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393952
  3. Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. SAGE.
  4. Zucker, L. G. (1988). Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Ballinger.
  5. Powell (1991). Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis. In The New Institutionalism.
  6. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction to the New Institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 1–38). University of Chicago Press.
  7. Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1994). Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism. SAGE.
  8. Donaldson, L. (1995). American Anti-management Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism "Old" and "New". Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 270. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393719
  10. Hirsch, P. M. (1997). Review Essay: Sociology Without Social Structure: Neoinstitutional Theory Meets Brave New World. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), 1702–1723. https://doi.org/10.1086/231132
  11. Stinchcombe, A. L. (2002). New sociological microfoundations for organizational theory: A postscript. In M. Lounsbury & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 19, pp. 415–433). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0733-558x(02)19014-8
  12. Jepperson, R. L. (2002). The Development and Application of Sociological Neoinstitutionalism. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch Jr. (Eds.), New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory (pp. 229–266). Rowman & Littlefield.
  13. Cooper, D. J., Ezzamel, M., & Willmott, H. (2008). Examining ‘Institutionalization’: A Critical Theoretic Perspective. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 673–701). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n29
  14. Meyer, R. E. (2008). New Sociology of Knowledge: Historical Legacy and Contributions to Current Debates in Institutional Research. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 519–538). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n22
  15. Meyer, J. W. (2008). Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 790–812). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n35
  16. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2012). Institutional Theory in Organization Studies. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446262023
  17. Glynn, M. A., & D’Aunno, T. (2023). An Intellectual History of Institutional Theory: Looking Back to Move Forward. Academy of Management Annals, 17(1), 301–330. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0341

8.2 Legitimacy and decoupling

  1. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.2307/2587886
  2. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586105
  3. Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does Isomorphism Legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039. https://doi.org/10.2307/2567222
  4. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). Decoupling Policy from Practice: The Case of Stock Repurchase Programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 202–228. https://doi.org/10.2307/26670862
  5. Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 49–77). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n22
26 more, listed in one source
  1. Brunsson, N. (1989). The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations. Wiley.
  2. Elsbach, K. D., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 699–738. https://doi.org/10.2307/256313
  3. Elsbach, K. D. (1994). Managing Organizational Legitimacy in the California Cattle Industry: The Construction and Effectiveness of Verbal Accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393494
  4. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1994). Substance and Symbolism in CEOs' Long-Term Incentive Plans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 367. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393295
  5. Wade, J. B., Porac, J. F., & Pollock, T. G. (1997). Worth, words, and the justification of executive pay. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(S1), 641–664. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199711)18:1+<641::aid-job910>3.0.co;2-m
  6. Ruef, M., & Scott, W. R. (1998). A Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy: Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393619
  7. Czarniawska, B., & Wolff, R. (1998). Constructing New Identities in Established Organization Fields: Young Universities in Old Europe. International Studies of Management & Organization, 28(3), 32–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1998.11656739
  8. Espeland, W. N. (1998). The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality, and Identity in the American Southwest. University of Chicago Press.
  9. Glynn, M. A., & Abzug, R. (2002). Institutionalizing Identity: Symbolic Isomorphism and Organizational Names. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069296
  10. Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040654
  11. Pedersen, J. S., & Dobbin, F. (2006). In Search of Identity and Legitimation: Bridging Organizational Culture and Neoinstitutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 897–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205284798
  12. Dacin, M. T., Oliver, C., & Roy, J. (2007). The legitimacy of strategic alliances: an institutional perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.577
  13. Glynn, M. A. (2008). Beyond Constraint: How Institutions Enable Identities. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 413–430). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n17
  14. Lee, G. K., & Paruchuri, S. (2008). Entry into Emergent and Uncertain Product-Markets: The Role of Associative Rhetoric. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.35732614
  15. Tilcsik, A. (2010). From Ritual to Reality: Demography, Ideology, and Decoupling in a Post-Communist Government Agency. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1474–1498. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318905
  16. Thomson, I., & Boutilier, R. G. (2010). Social License to Operate. In SME Mining Engineering Handbook, Chapter 17.2.
  17. Hallett, T. (2010). The Myth Incarnate: Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122409357044
  18. Kemp, D., Owen, J. R., Gotzmann, N., & Bond, C. J. (2011). Just Relations and Company–Community Conflict in Mining. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0711-y
  19. Wry, T., Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2011). Legitimating Nascent Collective Identities: Coordinating Cultural Entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 22(2), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0613
  20. Crilly, D., Zollo, M., & Hansen, M. T. (2012). Faking It or Muddling Through? Understanding Decoupling in Response to Stakeholder Pressures. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1429–1448. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0697
  21. Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012). From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.684462
  22. Crilly, D., Hansen, M., & Zollo, M. (2016). The Grammar of Decoupling: A Cognitive-Linguistic Perspective on Firms’ Sustainability Claims and Stakeholders’ Interpretation. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 705–729. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0171
  23. Stevens, C. E., Xie, E., & Peng, M. W. (2016). Toward a legitimacy‐based view of political risk: The case of Google and Yahoo in China. Strategic Management Journal, 37(5), 945–963. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2369
  24. Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0101
  25. Croidieu, G., & Kim, P. H. (2018). Labor of Love: Amateurs and Lay-expertise Legitimation in the Early U.S. Radio Field. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216686531
  26. Soublière, J.-F., & Gehman, J. (2020). The Legitimacy Threshold Revisited: How Prior Successes and Failures Spill Over to Other Endeavors on Kickstarter. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2), 472–502. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1103

8.3 Diffusion, adoption and translation of practices

  1. Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.2307/23923838
  2. Westphal, J. D., Gulati, R., & Shortell, S. M. (1997). Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 366. https://doi.org/10.2307/23939245
  3. Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (2004). The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions. American Sociological Review, 69(5), 748–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122404069005074
  4. Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf009935953
  5. Lounsbury, M. (2001). Institutional Sources of Practice Variation: Staffing College and University Recycling Programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/26671243
  6. Mezias, S. J. (1990). An Institutional Model of Organizational Practice: Financial Reporting at the Fortune 200. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 431. https://doi.org/10.2307/23933122
  7. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/30692932
  8. Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (2004). Should sociological theories venture into "economic territory?" Yes! American Sociological Review.2
  9. Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2004). The Diffusion of Ideas over Contested Terrain: The (Non)adoption of a Shareholder Value Orientation among German Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4), 501–534. https://doi.org/10.2307/41314892
  10. Briscoe, F., & Safford, S. (2008). The Nixon-in-China Effect: Activism, Imitation, and the Institutionalization of Contentious Practices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 460–491. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.3.4602
  11. Green, S. E., Jr., Li, Y., & Nohria, N. (2009). Suspended In Self-Spun Webs Of Significance: A Rhetorical Model Of Institutionalization And Institutionally Embedded Agency. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.364617252
  12. Ansari, S. M., Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2010). Made to Fit: How Practices Vary as They Diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.455778762
15 more, listed in one source
  1. Fligstein, N. (1985). The Spread of the Multidivisional Form Among Large Firms, 1919-1979. American Sociological Review, 50(3), 377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095547
  2. Fligstein, N. (1991). The structural transformation of American industry: An institutional account of the causes of diversification in the largest firms, 1919-1979. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 311–336). The University of Chicago Press.
  3. Palmer, D. A., Jennings, P. D., & Zhou, X. (1993). Late Adoption of the Multidivisional Form by Large U.S. Corporations: Institutional, Political, and Economic Accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393256
  4. Czarniawska-Joerges, B., & Sevón, G. (1996). Translating Organizational Change. de Gruyter.
  5. Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. (1997). Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 472. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393735
  6. Guler, I., Guillén, M. F., & Macpherson, J. M. (2002). Global Competition, Institutions, and the Diffusion of Organizational Practices: The International Spread of ISO 9000 Quality Certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094804
  7. Zuckerman, E. W. (2004). Towards the Social Reconstruction of an Interdisciplinary Turf War: Comment on Zajac and Westphal, ASR, June 2004. American Sociological Review, 69, 458–465.
  8. Zuckerman, E. W. (2004). Towards the social construction of an interdisciplinary turf war. American Sociological Review.
  9. Boxenbaum, E. (2006). Lost in Translation: The Making of Danish Diversity Management. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205285173
  10. Zilber, T. B. (2006). The Work of the Symbolic in Institutional Processes: Translations of Rational Myths in Israeli High Tech. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20786073
  11. Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating Ideas: Imitation, Translation and Editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 218–242). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n9
  12. Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2008). Isomorphism, Diffusion and Decoupling. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 78–98). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n3
  13. Kennedy, M. T., & Fiss, P. C. (2009). Institutionalization, Framing, and Diffusion: The Logic of TQM Adoption and Implementation Decisions among U.S. Hospitals. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 897–918. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.44633062
  14. Weber, K., Davis, G. F., & Lounsbury, M. (2009). Policy as Myth and Ceremony? The Global Spread of Stock Exchanges, 1980–2005. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1319–1347. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.47085184
  15. Colyvas, J. A., & Jonsson, S. (2011). Ubiquity and Legitimacy: Disentangling Diffusion and Institutionalization. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01386.x

8.4 Institutional logics and complexity

  1. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958– 1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/2103615
  2. Lounsbury, M. (2007). A Tale of Two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation in the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.246344365
  3. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.573183915
  4. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. In The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–128). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n44
  5. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford University Press.4
  6. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 232–263). University of Chicago Press.3
  7. Marquis, C., & Lounsbury, M. (2007). Vive La Résistance: Competing Logics and the Consolidation of U.S. Community Banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 799–820. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.262791723
  8. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.5902993
  9. Dunn, M. B., & Jones, C. (2010). Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism: The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education, 1967–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 114–149. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.1142
  10. McPherson, C. M., & Sauder, M. (2013). Logics in Action: Managing Institutional Complexity in a Drug Court. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392134864472
15 more, listed in one source
  1. Heimer, C. A. (1999). Competing Institutions: Law, Medicine, and Family in Neonatal Intensive Care. Law & Society Review, 33(1), 17–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/3115095
  2. Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619098
  3. Detert, J. R., & Pollock, T. G. (2008). Values, Interests, and the Capacity to Act: Understanding Professionals' Responses to Market-Based Improvement Initiatives in Highly Institutionalized Organizations. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(2), 186–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886308314901
  4. Purdy, J. M., & Gray, B. (2009). Conflicting Logics, Mechanisms of Diffusion, and Multilevel Dynamics in Emerging Institutional Fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.37308255
  5. Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803
  6. Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0453
  7. Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.51142368
  8. Smets, M., Morris, T., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From Practice to Field: A Multilevel Model of Practice-Driven Institutional Change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 877–904. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0013
  9. Jones, C., & Massa, F. G. (2013). From Novel Practice to Consecrated Exemplar: Unity Temple as a Case of Institutional Evangelizing. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1099–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613492073
  10. Ocasio, W., Mauskapf, M., & Steele, C. W. J. (2016). History, Society, and Institutions: The Role of Collective Memory in the Emergence and Evolution of Societal Logics. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 676–699. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0183
  11. Zhao, E. Y., & Wry, T. (2016). Not All Inequality Is Equal: Deconstructing the Societal Logic of Patriarchy to Understand Microfinance Lending to Women. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1994–2020. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0476
  12. Dimitriadis, S., Lee, M., Ramarajan, L., & Battilana, J. (2017). Blurring the Boundaries: The Interplay of Gender and Local Communities in the Commercialization of Social Ventures. Organization Science, 28(5), 819–839. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1144
  13. Greve, H. R., & Man Zhang, C. (2017). Institutional Logics and Power Sources: Merger and Acquisition Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 671–694. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0698
  14. Yan, S., Ferraro, F., & Almandoz, J. (2019). The Rise of Socially Responsible Investment Funds: The Paradoxical Role of the Financial Logic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(2), 466–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218773324
  15. Kroezen, J. J., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2019). What Is Dead May Never Die: Institutional Regeneration through Logic Reemergence in Dutch Beer Brewing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(4), 976–1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218817520

8.5 Institutional change, entrepreneurship, work and microfoundations

  1. Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.355
  2. Davis, G. F., Diekmann, K. A., & Tinsley, C. H. (1994). The Decline and Fall of the Conglomerate Firm in the 1980s: The Deinstitutionalization of an Organizational Form. American Sociological Review, 59(4), 547. https://doi.org/10.2307/20959314
  3. Kellogg, K. C. (2009). Operating Room: Relational Spaces and Microinstitutional Change in Surgery. American Journal of Sociology, 115(3), 657–711. https://doi.org/10.1086/6035354
  4. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment (pp. 3–21). Ballinger.3
  5. Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Copay, A., & King, T. (1991). Institutional Change and the Transformation of Interorganizational Fields: An Organizational History of the U.S. Radio Broadcasting Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 333. https://doi.org/10.2307/23932003
  6. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing together the Old and the New Institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022. https://doi.org/10.2307/2591632
  7. Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222. https://doi.org/10.2307/41343532
  8. Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and Institutional Work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Studies (pp. 215–254). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608030.n72
  9. Colyvas, J. A., & Powell, W. W. (2006). Roads to Institutionalization: The Remaking of Boundaries between Public and Private Science. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 305–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(06)27008-42
19 more, listed in one source
  1. Covaleski, M. A., & Dirsmith, M. W. (1988). An Institutional Perspective on the Rise, Social Transformation, and Fall of a University Budget Category. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(4), 562. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392644
  2. Oliver, C. (1992). The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), 563–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300403
  3. Clemens, E. S., & Cook, J. M. (1999). POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONALISM: Explaining Durability and Change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 441–466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.441
  4. Fligstein, N. (2001). INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURS AND CULTURAL FRAMES: The case of the European Union's Single Market Program. European Societies, 3(3), 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690120079332
  5. Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. (2002). Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: Introduction to the Special Research Forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069284
  6. Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R., & Suddaby, R. (2002). Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069285
  7. Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M., & Hirsch, P. M. (2003). Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: a cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review, 1(1), 71–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/soceco/1.1.71
  8. Lounsbury, M., & Rao, H. (2004). Sources of Durability and Change in Market Classifications: A Study of the Reconstitution of Product Categories in the American Mutual Fund Industry, 1944-1985. Social Forces, 82(3), 969–999. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0046
  9. Hallett, T., & Ventresca, M. J. (2006). Inhabited Institutions: Social Interactions and Organizational Forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Theory and Society, 35(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-006-9003-z
  10. Johnson, V. (2007). What Is Organizational Imprinting? Cultural Entrepreneurship in the Founding of the Paris Opera. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 97–127. https://doi.org/10.1086/517899
  11. Schneiberg, M. (2007). What's on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900–1950. Socio-Economic Review, 5(1), 47–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwl006
  12. Barley, S. R. (2008). Coalface Institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 491–518). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n21
  13. Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. (2008). Ending Corruption: The Interplay Among Institutional Logics, Resources, and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 750–770. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.32465769
  14. Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of Institutional Theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 276–298). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n11
  15. Schneiberg, M., & Lounsbury, M. (2008). Social Movements and Institutional Analysis. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 650–672). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n28
  16. Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. (2009). Discourse and Deinstitutionalization: the Decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 148–178. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.36461993
  17. Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. (2010). The Role of Analogy in the Institutionalization of Sustainability Reporting. Organization Science, 21(5), 1092–1107. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0494
  18. Cardinale, I. (2018). Beyond Constraining and Enabling: Toward New Microfoundations for Institutional Theory. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 132–155. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0020
  19. Harmon, D. J. (2019). When the Fed Speaks: Arguments, Emotions, and the Microfoundations of Institutions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(3), 542–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218777475

8.6 Organizational fields, communities and world society

  1. Tilcsik, A., & Marquis, C. (2013). Punctuated Generosity: How Mega-events and Natural Disasters Affect Corporate Philanthropy in U.S. Communities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 111–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392134758003
  2. Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World Society and the Nation‐State. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181. https://doi.org/10.1086/2311742
  3. Marquis, C. (2003). The Pressure of the Past: Network Imprinting in Intercorporate Communities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4), 655–689. https://doi.org/10.2307/35566402
  4. Barman, E. (2007). An Institutional Approach to Donor Control: From Dyadic Ties to a Field‐Level Analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1416–1457. https://doi.org/10.1086/5118022
  5. Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a Multilevel Theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 195–245. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.7660762
19 more, listed in one source
  1. Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1983). The organization of societal sectors. In Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 129–154). Sage.
  2. Meyer, J., Scott, W. R., & Strang, D. (1987). Centralization, Fragmentation, and School District Complexity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(2), 186. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393125
  3. Meyer, J. W., Thomas, G., Ramirez, F., & Boli, J. (1987). Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual. SAGE.
  4. Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.2307/257008
  5. Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J., & Caronna, C. A. (2000). Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. University of Chicago Press.
  6. Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Schofer, E. (2003). Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization. Stanford University Press.
  7. Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, A. H. (Eds.). (2006). Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199284535.001.0001
  8. Djelic, M.-L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (Eds.). (2006). Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511488665
  9. Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 925–945. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275683
  10. Drori, G. S. (2008). Institutionalism and Globalization Studies. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 449–472). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n19
  11. Djelic, M.-L., & Quack, S. (2008). Institutions and Transnationalization. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 299–324). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n12
  12. Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2008). Networks and Institutions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 596–623). SAGE.
  13. Wooten, M., & Hoffman, A. J. (2008). Organizational Fields: Past, Present and Future. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 130–147). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n5
  14. Marquis, C., & Battilana, J. (2009). Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.001
  15. Krücken, G., & Drori, G. S. (Eds.). (2009). World Society: The Writings of John W. Meyer. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199234042.001.0001
  16. Djelic, M.-L., & Quack, S. (Eds.). (2010). Transnational Communities: Shaping Global Economic Governance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511778100
  17. Marquis, C., Lounsbury, M., & Greenwood, R. (Eds.). (2011). Communities and Organizations. Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x(2011)33
  18. Marquis, C., Davis, G. F., & Glynn, M. A. (2013). Golfing Alone? Corporations, Elites, and Nonprofit Growth in 100 American Communities. Organization Science, 24(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0717
  19. Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2016). Institutional Equivalence: How Industry and Community Peers Influence Corporate Philanthropy. Organization Science, 27(5), 1325–1341. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1083

8.7 Law, regulation and the state

  1. Fligstein, N. (1996). Markets as Politics: A Political-Cultural Approach to Market Institutions. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 656. https://doi.org/10.2307/20963982
  2. Edelman, L. B., Uggen, C., & Erlanger, H. S. (1999). The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 406–454. https://doi.org/10.1086/2103162
  3. Schneiberg, M., & Bartley, T. (2001). Regulating American Industries: Markets, Politics, and the Institutional Determinants of Fire Insurance Regulation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 101–146. https://doi.org/10.1086/3235742
12 more, listed in one source
  1. Selznick, P. (1969). Law, Society and Industrial Justice. Russell Sage.
  2. Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (1978). Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. Octagon Books.
  3. Dobbin, F., Sutton, J. R., Meyer, J. W., & Scott, R. (1993). Equal Opportunity Law and the Construction of Internal Labor Markets. American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), 396–427. https://doi.org/10.1086/230269
  4. Sutton, J. R., Dobbin, F., Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1994). The Legalization of the Workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 99(4), 944–971. https://doi.org/10.1086/230368
  5. Edelman, L. B., & Suchman, M. C. (1997). The Legal Environments of Organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 479–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.479
  6. Dobbin, F., & Sutton, J. R. (1998). The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Divisions. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 441–476. https://doi.org/10.1086/210044
  7. Kelly, E., & Dobbin, F. (1999). Civil Rights Law at Work: Sex Discrimination and the Rise of Maternity. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 455–492. https://doi.org/10.1086/210317
  8. Hoffman, A. J., & Ventresca, M. J. (2002). Organizations, Policy and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives. Stanford University Press.
  9. Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. L. (2007). How to Stop Harassment: Professional Construction of Legal Compliance in Organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 112(4), 1203–1243. https://doi.org/10.1086/508788
  10. Edelman, L. B., & Suchman, M. C. (2007). The Legal Lives of Private Organizations. Ashgate.
  11. Lounsbury, M., & Hirsch, P. M. (Eds.). (2010). Markets on Trial: The Economic Sociology of the U.S. Financial Crisis: Part B. Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x(2010)30_part_b
  12. Posner, R. A. (2011). Economic Analysis of Law. Aspen.

8.8 National business systems and comparative institutions

  1. Dobbin, F. (1994). Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo97811391741833
  2. Bendix, R. (1956). Work and Authority in Industry: Ideologies of Management in the Course of Industrialization. University of California Press.2
  3. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Values. Sage.2
  4. Guillén, M. F. (1994). Models of Management: Work, Authority, and Organization in a Comparative Perspective. University of Chicago Press.2
  5. Djelic, M.-L. (1998). Exporting the American Model. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198293170.001.00012
  6. Campbell, J. L. (1998). Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory and Society, 27(3), 377–409. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:10068711149872
13 more, listed in one source
  1. Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. Basic.
  2. Cumings, B. (1987). The Origins and Development of the Northeast Asian Political Economy: Industrial Sectors, Product Cycles, and Political Consequences. In F. C. Deyo (Ed.), The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism (pp. 44–83). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501723766-005
  3. Soskice, D. (1991). The Institutional Infrastructure for International Competitiveness: A Comparative Analysis of the U.K. and Germany. In A. B. Atkinson & R. Brunetta (Eds.), Economics for the New Europe (pp. 45–66). Macmillan.
  4. Biernacki, R. (1995). The Fabrication of Labor: Germany and Britain, 1640-1914. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520377615
  5. Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
  6. Fligstein, N., & Byrkjeflot, H. (1996). The Logic of Employment Systems. In J. N. Baron, D. Grusky, & D. Treiman (Eds.), Social Differentiation and Social Inequality (pp. 11–35). Westview.
  7. Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198293965.001.0001
  8. Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 369–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
  9. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199247757.001.0001
  10. Kogut, B., Walker, G., & Anand, J. (2002). Agency and Institutions: National Divergences in Diversification Behavior. Organization Science, 13(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.2.162.533
  11. Whitley, R. (2007). Business Systems and Organizational Capabilities: The Institutional Structuring of Competitive Competences. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199205172.001.0001
  12. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
  13. Morgan, G., Campbell, J. L., Crouch, C., Pedersen, O. K., & Whitley, R. (Eds.). (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199233762.001.0001

8.9 The institution-based view and emerging markets

  1. Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional Transitions and Strategic Choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275. https://doi.org/10.2307/300407134
  2. North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.972
  3. Wan, W. P., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2003). Home country environments, corporate diversification strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/300406742
  4. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920–936. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.84003772
  5. Batjargal, B., Hitt, M. A., Tsui, A. S., Arregle, J.-L., Webb, J. W., & Miller, T. L. (2013). Institutional Polycentrism, Entrepreneurs' Social Networks, and New Venture Growth. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1024–1049. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.00952
  6. Marquis, C., & Qiao, K. (2020). Waking from Mao’s Dream: Communist Ideological Imprinting and the Internationalization of Entrepreneurial Ventures in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(3), 795–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392187928372
13 more, listed in one source
  1. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review.
  2. Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in Emerging Economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556394
  3. Yiu, D., & Makino, S. (2002). The Choice Between Joint Venture and Wholly Owned Subsidiary: An Institutional Perspective. Organization Science, 13(6), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.6.667.494
  4. Peng, M. W. (2002). Towards an Institution-Based View of Business Strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2-3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016291702714
  5. Peng, M. W. (2005). Perspectives—From China Strategy to Global Strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-005-1251-3
  6. North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829484
  7. Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.43479264
  8. Gao, G. Y., Murray, J. Y., Kotabe, M., & Lu, J. (2010). A “strategy tripod” perspective on export behaviors: Evidence from domestic and foreign firms based in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.27
  9. Sheth, J. N. (2011). Impact of Emerging Markets on Marketing: Rethinking Existing Perspectives and Practices. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.166
  10. Yang, Z., Su, C., & Fam, K.-S. (2012). Dealing with Institutional Distances in International Marketing Channels: Governance Strategies that Engender Legitimacy and Efficiency. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.10.0033
  11. Zhou, K. Z., & Xu, D. (2012). How foreign firms curtail local supplier opportunism in China: Detailed contracts, centralized control, and relational governance. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(7), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.7
  12. Ang, S. H., Benischke, M. H., & Doh, J. P. (2015). The interactions of institutions on foreign market entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1536–1553. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2295
  13. Ballesteros, L., & Gatignon, A. (2019). The relative value of firm and nonprofit experience: Tackling large‐scale social issues across institutional contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 40(4), 631–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2968